Discuss any hands-on training components of the training

Respond to the question using the lessons and vocabulary found in the readings. Support your response with examples and research. Your response should clarify your understanding of the topic. It should be your own—original and free from plagiarism. Follow APA format for the writing style, spelling and grammar, and citation of sources.

Start reviewing and responding to the postings of your peers as early in the week as possible. Respond to at least two of your peers. Participate in the discussion by analyzing each response for completeness and accuracy and by suggesting specific additions or clarifications for improving the discussion question response.

Training for Radiation Emergencies

The public can be exposed to hazardous levels of ionizing radiation from nuclear war and disasters involving releases from nuclear reactors (e.g., the Chernobyl disaster in 1986, related to reactor malfunction and the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster in 2011, related to the earthquake and tsunami). Dispersion of radiation may also occur from medical devices unintentionally. In 1985, a radiotherapy clinic in Goiânia, Brazil, was closed down. However, the clinic left behind an unsecured cesium-137 therapy device. The device was taken apart for scrap by unknowing members of the public, exposing dozens of people to radiation and causing four deaths (International Atomic Energy Agency, 1988). Some experts have predicted that terrorists might use ordinary explosives to disseminate radiation (dirty bombs). To prepare for these events as well as other events involving releases of ionizing radiation or nuclear material, emergency responders such as HazMat personnel, emergency medical services professionals, law enforcement, and the public health workforce receive training.

Using the Internet, find one example of such a training program or course for emergency responders described in detail. This may be a training that is provided locally or regionally in your state or provided at the national level by groups such as those listed in the Federal Emergency Management Association’s (FEMA’s) Center for Domestic Preparedness.

In your response, address the following:

  • Briefly describe the course or training program, including whether the goal of the training is awareness or performance. List several key course objectives.
  • Discuss any hands-on training components of the training (such as drills, operation of equipment, handling of radioactive sources, etc.).
  • Who may benefit from the trainings on responding to radiation emergencies? What are some barriers to providing training to those groups?
 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Explain how the focus area relates to the individual, the family, and the community, as well as to all age groups throughout the life span.

  DETAILS : (Please visit the website http://www.healthypeople.gov/ ) to do the assigment.. Please    the   assigment has to be free of Plagiarism.

 

This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment.

 

It is important to promote the professional role of the nurse to provide health promotion and disease preventive care. Collaborating with other health care professionals and consumer groups in the community in redesigning health care can help meet the goals for Healthy People 2020.

Refer to http://www.healthypeople.gov/ to open the Healthy People 2020 home page.

  1. Select the”Topics & Objectives” : Immunization and Infectious Diseases           

 

Develop a PowerPoint presentation (15-20 slides) with accompanying speaker’s notes and citations.

For help designing PowerPoint slides, refer to the “Create Your First Presentation” PowerPoint tutorial, located on the Microsoft website:

https://support.office.com/en-us/article/Create-your-first-presentation-ac88d138-a7a0-402c-b5a5-812641e59c8e?ui=en-US&rs=en-US&ad=US

In the presentation, address the following:

  1. State the objective of the presentation.
  2. State the Healthy People 2020 focus area your group has selected and the rationale for selection of the specific focus area.
  3. Explain how the focus area relates to the individual, the family, and the community, as well as to all age groups throughout the life span.
  4. Identify ways to enhance or optimize health in the selected focus area using evidence-based research. A minimum of three peer-reviewed articles must be utilized.
  5. Address the health disparity among different segments of the population for the selected focus area.
  6. Provide a brief description of at least two community resources and at least two website resources for professionals and clients.
  7. Provide a brief profile of at least one health-related organization for the selected focus area.

APA format is required for essays only. Solid academic writing is always expected.

 

For all assignment delivery options, documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

 

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

 

Rubric

 

CLC – Health Promotion and Community Resource Teaching Project

1
Unsatisfactory 0% – 71%
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory 72% – 75%
75.00%
3
Satisfactory 76% – 79%
79.00%
4
Good 80% – 89%
89.00%
5
Excellent 90% – 100%
100.00%
40.0 %Content
7.0 % Objective of Presentation Stated. Healthy People 2020 Focus Area and Rational for Its Selection
Stated objective of presentation and/or the selected Healthy People 2020 focus area, along with the rationale for selection of the specific focus area, are not stated.
Stated objective of presentation and the selected Healthy People 2020 focus area, along with the rationale for selection of the specific focus area, are offered, but they are incomplete, lacking relevant information.
Stated objective of presentation and the selected Healthy People 2020 focus area, along with the rationale for selection of the specific focus area, are offered at a basic level with limited detail.
Stated objective of presentation and the selected Healthy People 2020 focus area, along with the rationale for selection of the specific focus area, are offered in detail.
Stated objective of presentation and the selected Healthy People 2020 focus area, along with the rationale for selection of the specific focus area, are offered in detail, providing insight and/or reflection.
7.0 % Explanation of the Selected Focus Area as It Relates to All Age Groups Throughout the Life Span
Explanation of the selected focus area as it relates to all age groups throughout the life span is not offered.
Explanation of the selected focus area as it relates to all age groups throughout the life span is offered, but it is incomplete, lacking relevant information.
Explanation of the selected focus area as it relates to all age groups throughout the life span is accurate.
Explanation of the selected focus area as it relates to all age groups throughout the life span is accurate and offered in detail.
Explanation of the selected focus area as it relates to all age groups throughout the life span is accurate and offered in detail, while offering insight and/or reflection.
7.0 % Identification of Ways to Enhance or Optimize Health in the Selected Healthy People 2020 Focus Area Using Evidence-Based Research With a Minimum of Three Peer-Reviewed Articles
Identification of ways to enhance or optimize health in the selected Healthy People 2020 focus area using evidence-based research, using a minimum of three peer reviewed articles is not offered.
Identification of ways to enhance or optimize health in the selected Healthy People 2020 focus area using evidence-based research, using a minimum of three peer reviewed articles is offered, but it is incomplete, lacking relevant information.
Identification of ways to enhance or optimize health in the selected Healthy People 2020 focus area using evidence-based research, using a minimum of three peer reviewed articles is offered at a basic level with limited detail.
Identification of ways to enhance or optimize health in the selected Healthy People 2020 focus area using evidence-based research, using a minimum of three peer reviewed articles are offered in detail.
Identification of ways to enhance or optimize health in the selected Healthy People 2020 focus area using evidence-based research, using a minimum of three peer reviewed articles are offered in detail, while offering insight and/or reflection.
6.0 % Health Disparity Among Different Segments of the Population for the Selected Focus Area
The addressing of the health disparity among different segments of the population for the selected focus area is not offered.
The addressing of the health disparity among different segments of the population for the selected focus area is offered, but it is incomplete, lacking relevant information.
The addressing of the health disparity among different segments of the population for the selected focus area is accurate.
The addressing of the health disparity among different segments of the population for the selected focus area is accurate and offered in detail.
The addressing of the health disparity among different segments of the population for the selected focus area is accurate and offered in detail, while offering insight and/or reflection.
6.0 % Resources for Professionals and Clients
No community resources or website resources for professionals and clients are offered.
The community resources and website resources for professionals and clients are not appropriate for the selected area of focus.
A brief description of two community resources and website resources for professionals and clients is offered for the selected area of focus.
A brief description of two community resources and website resources for professionals and clients for the selected area of focus is accurate and offered in detail.
A brief description of two community resources and website resources for professionals and clients for the selected area of focus is accurate and offered in detail. Selection of community resources and websites reflect thoughtful consideration to users of resources.
7.0 % Health-Related Organization for the Selected Focus Area
No health-related organization for the selected focus area is offered.
A brief profile of at least one health-related organization for the selected focus area is offered, but it is inappropriate for the selected area of focus or is missing relevant information.
A brief profile of one health-related organization for the selected focus area is offered.
A brief profile of one health-related organization for the selected focus area is accurate and offered in detail.
A brief profile of one health-related organization for the selected focus area is accurate and offered in detail. Selection of community resources and websites reflects thoughtful consideration to users of resources.
45.0 %Organization & Effectiveness
40.0 % Presentation of Content
The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.
The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.
The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.
The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources.
The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
5.0 % Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)
Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.
Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.
Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.
The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.
The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
15.0 %Format
5.0 % Evaluating and Documenting Sources (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, references page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)
Contains no title slide, no references section, and no correctly cited references within the body of the presentation.
Title slide is incomplete or inaccurate. References section includes sources, but many citation errors. Citations are included within the body of the presentation but with many errors.
Title slide has minor errors. References section includes sources, but they are not consistently cited correctly. Citations are included within the body of the presentation but with some errors.
Title slide is complete. References section includes correctly cited sources with minimal errors. Correct citations are included within the body of the presentation.
Title slide is complete. References section includes correctly cited sources. Correct citations are included within the body of the presentation.
5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader.
Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.
Writer is clearly in control of standard, written academic English.
5.0 % Layout
The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.
The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.
The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.
The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.
The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
100 %

 

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Evaluate the outcomes of the hypothetical application of your intervention. Did statistical differences occur in the outcomes? Were there qualitative reports of change?

For this Assignment you will create a document:

  • a minimum of 5 pages in length (excluding title page and references);
  • supported with a minimum of five scholarly, peer review sources external to those assigned in class for this unit;
  • follow the conventions of Standard American English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.);
  • well ordered, logical, and unified, as well as original and insightful;
  • display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics; and;
  • use APA 6th edition format.

The content for this essay will include:

  1. Identify a specific target population for the evidence-based clinical prevention and population health intervention you proposed in your Unit 7 Discussion
  2. Analyze the:
    1. cultural;
    2. psychosocial dimensions;
    3. environmental factors;
    4. demographic descriptors;
    5. health literacy; and
    6. if appropriate, the bio-statistical data for the specific target population.
  3. Hypothetically, apply the intervention from Unit 7 to your target population. Be creative! You can decide whether your intervention concluded with positive or negative results but you must describe how you evaluated the outcomes to support your choice. For example, did you use a Likert scale? A survey? Did you collect statistical data?
  4. Evaluate the outcomes of the hypothetical application of your intervention. Did statistical differences occur in the outcomes? Were there qualitative reports of change?
 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

What are the key leadership challenges at this time that may enhance acceptance of the project or resistance? How will the organization climate support the change?

Note:

Read the following requirements thoroughly, and write 4-5 pages paper on the instructions given below. Your paper must include headings before started each new section. You must include 10 scholarly references cited in APA. Scholarly references need to be current, 5–8 years or less  (anonymous authors or web pages are not acceptable).Your answer must be 100% original.

 

Requirements:

Part A of the Systems Leadership Project will consist of identifying a quality improvement or evidence-based or knowledge-based issue in an area of nursing practice relevant to your role as a DNP. The area may be in a

  1. Hospital;
  2. Clinic;
  3. public health agency;
  4. non-governmental agency; and
  5. global health, policy arena.

You are to select a problem in one above area of interest for you, for example:

·         addressing hospital throughput issues as a nurse executive

·         changing the clinic staffing matrix of an interdisciplinary clinic

·         Lean or Six Sigma improvement strategies

·         implementing purposeful rounding and bedside reporting based on best practices to improve HCAHPS scores

·         reorganizing the care delivery model of various nursing units based on evidence from Magnet hospitals

·         designing and implementing a culture of safety and identifying areas of nursing program growth as an administrative dean of an online nursing program

You must address the following objectives.

1.     Problem identification—quality improvement or evidence-based or knowledge-based issue

a)     The problem needs to be current and relevant to the organization or clinic.

b)    The problem needs to include cost, quality, and efficiency aspects.

c)     The problem needs to match the mission or vision statement of the organization and organizational strategic plan for the next 5 years.

2.     Significance of the problem as it relates to healthcare leadership, academics, finance and economics

a)     What leadership elements are crucial to the success of this problem area?

b)    State several significant areas that the problem relates to—leadership and finance, academics, and economics.

3.     Literature review related to what is known about the significance of the problem, what is not known, and how your project plans could potential fill the gap

4.     Your role as a DNP in addressing the problem

a)     What are the key leadership challenges at this time that may enhance acceptance of the project or resistance? How will the organization climate support the change?

b)    What leadership skills are most conducive to create a favorable proposed change process?

5.     Key stakeholders identified and several key measures or indicators of healthcare outcomes that is important to stakeholders and that you will use in addressing the problem area

a)     Identify stakeholders that will support change in the problem area.

b)    Identify stakeholders that will create resistance in change.

c)     Identify stakeholders that will have the greatest influence over positive or negative changes related to the problem area. Identify ways in which to work with all the various groups of stakeholders

Note:  A minimum of 10 scholarly references must be used. Scholarly references need to be current, 5–8 years or less  (anonymous authors or web pages are not acceptable).

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"